news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Tom Mulcair as PM would end Canada's fight with

Canadian Content
20688news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Tom Mulcair as PM would end Canada's fight with ISIS


Political | 206880 hits | Sep 09 8:26 pm | Posted by: martin14
42 Comment

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair says his first acts as prime minister would include pulling the Canadian Forces out of Iraq and Syria, bringing in 10,000 Syrian refugees and reducing taxes for small and medium-sized businesses.

Comments

  1. by avatar martin14
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 3:28 am
    Dippers have always been, and will always be, cowards.

    Running and hiding won't solve this problem.

  2. by avatar xerxes
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 3:50 am
    Neither will a total of four sorties against ISIS. Which is what we've done so far.

  3. by Thanos
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:04 am
    I don't necessarily disagree with the Dippers on this one. If our overall contribution is negligible due to our low numbers and aircraft and antiquated equipment it might not be worth the financial cost of doing it just for the dubious glory of being part of a coalition. This isn't probably the reason why the Dippers are objecting to the participation, mind you. Their objection has less to do with the problems of logistics and a negligible contribution due to having to use long-obsolete planes and more to do with their fucked-up pity-politics they've always had for the dangerous militants of the world.

  4. by avatar BRAH
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:13 am
    "Thanos" said
    I don't necessarily disagree with the Dippers on this one. If our overall contribution is negligible due to our low numbers and aircraft and antiquated equipment it might not be worth the financial cost of doing it just for the dubious glory of being part of a coalition. This isn't probably the reason why the Dippers are objecting to the participation, mind you. Their objection has less to do with the problems of logistics and a negligible contribution due to having to use long-obsolete planes and more to do with their fucked-up pity-politics they've always had for the dangerous militants of the world.

    The reality is today they're isolationists who would have given Hitler a free pass in World War II.

  5. by Thanos
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:22 am
    "BRAH" said
    I don't necessarily disagree with the Dippers on this one. If our overall contribution is negligible due to our low numbers and aircraft and antiquated equipment it might not be worth the financial cost of doing it just for the dubious glory of being part of a coalition. This isn't probably the reason why the Dippers are objecting to the participation, mind you. Their objection has less to do with the problems of logistics and a negligible contribution due to having to use long-obsolete planes and more to do with their fucked-up pity-politics they've always had for the dangerous militants of the world.

    The reality is today they're isolationists who would have given Hitler a free pass in World War II.

    No disagreement there. That's why I keep saying the Dippers will always be mentally and emotionally locked into the 1960's. That was the height of militancy "in the name of the people!" and hard leftists still flock to that banner whenever it's raised in the world, no matter how atavistic and murderous the scum are that are waving it. The Dippers on terrorism are just like that old guy in The Road Warrior who said "this Lord Humungous seems like a reasonable fellow" and wanted to open the gates so he could go out and talk to them. :roll:

  6. by avatar BRAH
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:26 am
    "Thanos" said
    I don't necessarily disagree with the Dippers on this one. If our overall contribution is negligible due to our low numbers and aircraft and antiquated equipment it might not be worth the financial cost of doing it just for the dubious glory of being part of a coalition. This isn't probably the reason why the Dippers are objecting to the participation, mind you. Their objection has less to do with the problems of logistics and a negligible contribution due to having to use long-obsolete planes and more to do with their fucked-up pity-politics they've always had for the dangerous militants of the world.

    The reality is today they're isolationists who would have given Hitler a free pass in World War II.

    No disagreement there. That's why I keep saying the Dippers will always be mentally and emotionally locked into the 1960's. That was the height of militancy "in the name of the people!" and hard leftists still flock to that banner whenever it's raised in the world, no matter how atavistic and murderous the scum are that are waving it. The Dippers on terrorism are just like that old guy in The Road Warrior who said "this Lord Humungous seems like a reasonable fellow" and wanted to open the gates so he could go out and talk to them. :roll:

    GOLD HELP US! 8O

  7. by avatar herbie
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:49 am
    "martin14" said
    Dippers have always been, and will always be, cowards.

    Running and hiding won't solve this problem.

    You mean like into a closet, then trying to make everyone feel just as afraid?

  8. by Thanos
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:57 am
    Yeah, it was real shitty of Parliament Hill security to make sure that the leader of the nation was taken to a secure spot during the shooting. No where near as brave as all the Dippers who wanted to go up to the shooter and shake his hand.

  9. by avatar martin14
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:39 am
    "Thanos" said
    Yeah, it was real shitty of Parliament Hill security to make sure that the leader of the nation was taken to a secure spot during the shooting. No where near as brave as all the Dippers who wanted to go up to the shooter and shake his hand.

    :lol: :lol:

  10. by avatar bootlegga
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:47 am
    "Newsbot" said
    Tom Mulcair as PM would end Canada's fight with ISIS

    Posted By:
    2015-09-09 20:26:26


    And that is why the NDP will NOT get my vote.

  11. by Thanos
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:49 am
    "martin14" said
    Yeah, it was real shitty of Parliament Hill security to make sure that the leader of the nation was taken to a secure spot during the shooting. No where near as brave as all the Dippers who wanted to go up to the shooter and shake his hand.

    :lol: :lol:

    I read the comments on the CBC website when the shooting happened. The majority of commenters actively hoped that Harper be killed by the shooter. That's the kind of people too many of them are, down deep in their miserable hearts. Their hatred is too strong for them to perpetually contain and during moments like that they let it spill out into the open. But they're all better people than the rest of us because they want big tax hikes and triple-levels of social program spending..... :roll: :evil:

  12. by avatar BRAH
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:56 am
    "Thanos" said
    Yeah, it was real shitty of Parliament Hill security to make sure that the leader of the nation was taken to a secure spot during the shooting. No where near as brave as all the Dippers who wanted to go up to the shooter and shake his hand.

    BAM! :lol:

  13. by avatar BRAH
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:58 am
    "herbie" said
    Dippers have always been, and will always be, cowards.

    Running and hiding won't solve this problem.

    You mean like into a closet, then trying to make everyone feel just as afraid?
    :roll:

  14. by avatar martin14
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:04 am
    "Thanos" said
    Yeah, it was real shitty of Parliament Hill security to make sure that the leader of the nation was taken to a secure spot during the shooting. No where near as brave as all the Dippers who wanted to go up to the shooter and shake his hand.

    :lol: :lol:

    I read the comments on the CBC website


    Yeah that's never a good idea.


    http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/nahlah-aye ... -1.3220881

    skimming the comments, looks like the lefties haven't shown up .. yet. :D



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net