news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Bill C-13 opens door to warrantless spying of o

Canadian Content
20679news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Bill C-13 opens door to warrantless spying of our phones and computers


Law & Order | 206781 hits | May 16 12:58 pm | Posted by: DrCaleb
17 Comment

Todd was testifying about bill C-13, which will make it illegal to share an intimate image of someone without that person�s consent. But while the government�s communications effort around the bill focuses on preventing these tragedies, most of the 70-pag

Comments

  1. by avatar DrCaleb
    Fri May 16, 2014 8:03 pm
    "You are with us, or you are with the child pornographers" Remember that? This is the same legslation, but we are told 'think of the children' now. Read the bit about the NSA at the bottom too.

  2. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri May 16, 2014 8:07 pm
    Those who are willing to trade essential liberty for security deserve neither.

  3. by avatar martin14
    Fri May 16, 2014 8:07 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Those who are willing to trade essential liberty for security deserve neither.


    Which is exactly what we will get.... neither.

  4. by avatar DrCaleb
    Fri May 16, 2014 8:12 pm
    "martin14" said
    Those who are willing to trade essential liberty for security deserve neither.


    Which is exactly what we will get.... neither.

    Both are impossible when it's the people we expect to do these things that are the ones we need to be wary of.

  5. by peck420
    Fri May 16, 2014 8:15 pm
    Anybody happen to have the actual part, from the bill, that opens the door to warrant-less spying?

    Bill C-13:

    It's almost like people didn't realize that telecomms were handing over our information (without warrants) for a very long time already...

  6. by avatar Jabberwalker
    Fri May 16, 2014 8:22 pm
    And how the hell do you process terabytes per milliseconds of that information? They are listening to everything but I'll wager that they are hearing next to nothing.

  7. by avatar DrCaleb
    Fri May 16, 2014 8:35 pm
    "peck420" said
    Anybody happen to have the actual part, from the bill, that opens the door to warrant-less spying?




    487.0195 (1) For greater certainty, no preservation demand, preservation order or production order is necessary for a peace officer or public officer to ask a person to voluntarily preserve data that the person is not prohibited by law from preserving or to voluntarily provide a document to the officer that the person is not prohibited by law from disclosing.

    (2) A person who preserves data or provides a document in those circumstances does not incur any criminal or civil liability for doing so.


    No 'Judge' or 'Justice' required.

    "peck420" said

    It's almost like people didn't realize that telecomms were handing over our information (without warrants) for a very long time already...


    Not like I haven't been shouting it from the rooftops for years . . . XD

  8. by avatar DrCaleb
    Fri May 16, 2014 8:36 pm
    Oh, and the link to the bill is:

    http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications ... &File=24#1

  9. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Fri May 16, 2014 8:37 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    Those who are willing to trade essential liberty for security deserve neither.


    Which is exactly what we will get.... neither.

    Both are impossible when it's the people we expect to do these things that are the ones we need to be wary of.

    The problem of the Canadian paradigm is similar to that in the USA and that's political correctness.

    If law enforcement monitors the members of Islamic groups with ties to known terror groups then they'l be pilloried in the media if it gets out.

    Therefore they'll ignore the worst threats and instead concentrate on people who buy stuff on the net to avoid paying GST or some such.

  10. by peck420
    Fri May 16, 2014 9:06 pm
    "DrCaleb" said


    487.0195 (1) For greater certainty, no preservation demand, preservation order or production order is necessary for a peace officer or public officer to ask a person to voluntarily preserve data that the person is not prohibited by law from preserving or to voluntarily provide a document to the officer that the person is not prohibited by law from disclosing.

    (2) A person who preserves data or provides a document in those circumstances does not incur any criminal or civil liability for doing so.


    No 'Judge' or 'Justice' required.





    They can not force them to do it without a warrant.

  11. by peck420
    Fri May 16, 2014 9:06 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    Oh, and the link to the bill is:

    http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications ... &File=24#1

    :oops:


  12. by avatar DrCaleb
    Tue May 20, 2014 1:21 pm
    "peck420" said


    487.0195 (1) For greater certainty, no preservation demand, preservation order or production order is necessary for a peace officer or public officer to ask a person to voluntarily preserve data that the person is not prohibited by law from preserving or to voluntarily provide a document to the officer that the person is not prohibited by law from disclosing.

    (2) A person who preserves data or provides a document in those circumstances does not incur any criminal or civil liability for doing so.


    No 'Judge' or 'Justice' required.





    They can not force them to do it without a warrant.

    Really? That's what you take away from that?

    Police can go to a phone company, ask that your records be given to them without judicial oversight and the phone company (credit card company, ISP...) will face no repercussions so long as they are not legally restricted from giving that information - and all you see is that the company doesn't have to if they don't want to?

    I'd like you to meet this guy, Edward Snowdon, who's been telling us for quite some time that they've been doing it for a long while anyway. :(

    They used to require a 'preservation demand', now they won't. That's the only real change here. Who needs privacy legislation anyhow?

  13. by avatar PostFactum
    Tue May 20, 2014 1:34 pm
    Who cares, spying with warranty or without it. They are already spying without papers.

  14. by avatar DrCaleb
    Tue May 20, 2014 2:34 pm
    "PostFactum" said
    Who cares, spying with warranty or without it. They are already spying without papers.


    I care, because the government has certain responsibilities with respect to me, my fellow citizens and and our safety. And wasting time and resources protecting me from me is a waste of limited resources. Pretending that this legislation is really about protecting teens online is also an affront to our intelligence.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • N_Fiddledog Fri May 16, 2014 3:42 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net