news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

MP's bill would protect right to fly Canadian f

Canadian Content
20821news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

MP's bill would protect right to fly Canadian flag


Political | 208205 hits | Sep 28 12:59 pm | Posted by: wildrosegirl
58 Comment

A rookie Conservative MP is unfurling a private member's bill Wednesday that would make it illegal to prevent someone from displaying a Canadian flag.

Comments

  1. by Canadian_Mind
    Wed Sep 28, 2011 11:31 pm
    Legislating stupidity... Too bad it happens. Hope this passes.

  2. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Wed Sep 28, 2011 11:38 pm
    It's not a bad idea. We've got the same kind of things happening down here with people who hate the flag trying to restrict people from flying it despite a Federal law exempting the US flag from Federal, state, and local restrictions that are not directly related to public safety.

    In California in the past year or so there was a school that banned the US flag because it was 'offensive' to Mexican students and the Federal law was properly invoked to put an end to that BS. It would not surprise me to find the same kind of horsepuckey going on up north so this law is not a bad idea.

  3. by avatar DanSC
    Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:03 am
    "BartSimpson" said
    It's not a bad idea. We've got the same kind of things happening down here with people who hate the flag trying to restrict people from flying it despite a Federal law exempting the US flag from Federal, state, and local restrictions that are not directly related to public safety.

    Wouldn't the First Amendment also bypass any restrictions?

  4. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:42 am
    Byrne added that the bill could have all sorts of unintended consequences, such as a prisoner hanging a flag in a jail cell in order to block the view of jail guards.

    "The day that the warden comes to take down that Canadian flag, that's who is going to be the prisoner's cell mate, because it's going to come with a two-year prison sentence."

    Only if the warden is too stupid to just move it to a part of the cell that doesn't restrict the view of the guards.

    Despite Byrne's whining, considering the national anthem has been essentially banned in several schools across the country, this just seems like a good pre-emptive measure to prevent the same bullshit from becoming ingrained in respect to our flag.

  5. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:48 am

    In California in the past year or so there was a school that banned the US flag because it was 'offensive' to Mexican students


    Well if Juan Wetback is offended by it, then he should get the coyotes to refund his 'immigration fees' and head back to Meh HEE ko

  6. by eureka
    Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:04 am
    It is not quite that straightforward. The Bill is probably well intentioned but it is not well thought out and needs amendments.

    Landlords object to it because tenants sometimes fix flags to buildings. Not just fly them.

    Then, a point that is raised is that of desecration. Is it desecration to fly a flag that is worn to tatters.

    It is not an issue that I have thought much about; nor have I read just what is proposed but I have heard objections. Not to the flag but to the Bill.

    Besides, who needs this CPC initiative at this time when there are prisons to be built and oil companies to be facilitated and tax changes to shift the burden further away from the CPC supporters. Could it not wait until the CPC has lost its urgew to destroy?

  7. by avatar herbie
    Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:20 am
    It's a stupid "let's be like Americans" law that's not needed, not wanted, but it will make more criminals which is what they're good at doing.

  8. by avatar DanSC
    Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:22 am
    "herbie" said
    It's a stupid "let's be like Americans" law that's not needed

    Yeah! Protected speech? Who needs it? That's American-style.

  9. by avatar RUEZ
    Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:49 am
    "herbie" said
    It's a stupid "let's be like Americans" law that's not needed, not wanted, but it will make more criminals which is what they're good at doing.

    Christ, every time the Conservatives fart you people compare him to the Americans. You need a new play book.

  10. by avatar martin14
    Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:38 am
    "eureka" said
    It is not quite that straightforward. The Bill is probably well intentioned but it is not well thought out and needs amendments.

    Landlords object to it because tenants sometimes fix flags to buildings. Not just fly them.

    Then, a point that is raised is that of desecration. Is it desecration to fly a flag that is worn to tatters.

    It is not an issue that I have thought much about; nor have I read just what is proposed but I have heard objections. Not to the flag but to the Bill.

    Besides, who needs this CPC initiative at this time when there are prisons to be built and oil companies to be facilitated and tax changes to shift the burden further away from the CPC supporters. Could it not wait until the CPC has lost its urgew to destroy?



    almost raised some points worthy of considering, the flag needs to be treated with respect.

    And then you fuck it up with your typical partisan asshattery.

    Well done.

  11. by eureka
    Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:13 pm
    The flag needs to be treated with respect, Martin, but even more so does Parliament. Riding roughshod over the will of Canadians should not be buried under a welter of "patriotic" shams.

    This government has used this tactic several times. Any who criticise the Afghanistan misadventure are "denigrating our brave soldiers." They make me cringe (and furious) with their false patriotism.

  12. by avatar GreenTiger
    Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:56 am
    "BartSimpson" said
    It's not a bad idea. We've got the same kind of things happening down here with people who hate the flag trying to restrict people from flying it despite a Federal law exempting the US flag from Federal, state, and local restrictions that are not directly related to public safety.

    In California in the past year or so there was a school that banned the US flag because it was 'offensive' to Mexican students and the Federal law was properly invoked to put an end to that BS. It would not surprise me to find the same kind of horsepuckey going on up north so this law is not a bad idea.


    I 100% agree. I wish we had a law like that in The States. If the Canadian Flag flying in Canada is offensive to anybody as the mother would have put it "That is too God damn bad".

    In my Optical shop inside America's Largest Retailer my manager had to take down an American Flag poster as it might offend the local immigrant community. So yes that BS happens here too.

    There are thee flags that I fly routinely at my home: The US flag, The Canadian Flag and the Hawaiian depending on the mood I am in. If anybody has a problem with any of the above that is real unfortunate.



  13. by avatar BeaverFever
    Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:32 am
    Guys -- we already have protections on the freedom of speech that adequately cover this subject. This new law will not change anything one bit. It's cheap pandering. Why don't we pass another law, that protects the word right to say the word "Canada". Then lets pass a third law that protects the right drive to a national memorial. Then we can pass a fourth law that protects the right to fly a Canadian flag while driving to national memorial and saying the word "Canada".

    In fact, lets spend hours and hours trying to think of every possible patriotic symbol and action, and then ammend the Constituion with countless provisions that spell out in detail the right to engage in each of these actions.

    There is no crisis of Canadians being unable to fly the flag...thats why this bill is stupid.

  14. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:54 am

    Guys -- we already have protections on the freedom of speech that adequately cover this subject. This new law will not change anything one bit. It's cheap pandering.

    So you'd be OK with doing away with 'hate crimes' too? The laws are already on our books to deal with threats, intimidation, harassment and assault.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net