news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Obama, GOP pledge action to resolve impasse on

Canadian Content
20834news upnews down

Obama, GOP pledge action to resolve impasse on tax cuts


Economics | 208337 hits | Nov 30 11:09 am | Posted by: Khar
9 Comment

President Obama and congressional leaders agreed in a much-anticipated meeting Tuesday to set up an informal group of administration officials and lawmakers to resolve an impasse on tax cuts that are due to expire at the end of the year.

Comments

  1. by avatar KorbenDeck
    Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:38 pm
    Okay here is what I do not understand, these tax cuts that Bush brought in. Are they forced to vote on wiether to renew or can they simply not vote and the whole thing expires?

  2. by avatar Public_Domain
    Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:41 pm
    :|

  3. by avatar andyt
    Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:49 pm
    "KorbenDeck" said
    Okay here is what I do not understand, these tax cuts that Bush brought in. Are they forced to vote on wiether to renew or can they simply not vote and the whole thing expires?


    These are the tax cuts Bush brought in that immediately turned Clinton's surplus into a deficit. They are set to expire Dec. 31. The Demoncrats want to extend the cuts for all income below 250,000, the Republicons, supported by all those Joe the Plumbers want to extend the cuts for income above 250,000.

    Looks like Obama is going to trade giving the rich their tax cut, ie increase the deficit even more, for the Republicons voting for arms control. Bad move

  4. by avatar Pseudonym
    Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:14 pm
    I, for one, would like to keep the current tax rates (with the Bush tax cuts) and begin to eliminate all the exemptions that, as Warren Buffett likes to point out, make the rich pay less proportionally than those less so.

  5. by avatar Proculation
    Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:32 pm
    "As of 2010, the U.S. tax code is 71684 pages in length."

    Maybe the problem lies in that simple fact :?:

  6. by avatar Proculation
    Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:34 pm
    "Mr_Canada" said
    Oh great, more meetings to say that there will be meetings to decide if there will be more meetings in the future.

    Ugh.

    Bureaucracy at work. Isn't it what you wish for ? :wink:

  7. by avatar andyt
    Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:22 pm
    "Pseudonym" said
    I, for one, would like to keep the current tax rates (with the Bush tax cuts) and begin to eliminate all the exemptions that, as Warren Buffett likes to point out, make the rich pay less proportionally than those less so.


    Do you have a clear understanding of how those exemptions work? If so please share. I don't understand how Buffet paid 19% rate on 8 million in earnings, while his secretary, who presumably earned a lot less paid 30% on her earnings. That makes no sense at all.

    If the rich wind up paying a higher rate under a tax cut, I have no problem with that.

  8. by avatar xerxes
    Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:03 pm
    I wonder how long it will take Obama to cave to the GOP as per the Democratic party norm.

  9. by avatar Proculation
    Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:41 pm
    "andyt" said
    I, for one, would like to keep the current tax rates (with the Bush tax cuts) and begin to eliminate all the exemptions that, as Warren Buffett likes to point out, make the rich pay less proportionally than those less so.


    Do you have a clear understanding of how those exemptions work? If so please share. I don't understand how Buffet paid 19% rate on 8 million in earnings, while his secretary, who presumably earned a lot less paid 30% on her earnings. That makes no sense at all.

    If the rich wind up paying a higher rate under a tax cut, I have no problem with that.

    I'm only speculating here (pun not intended :P) but i'm pretty sure it's because Buffet's earnings are not "incomes" but dividends and gains on capital from his investments.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net