CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:40 am
 


Title: Quebec's child-care scheme pays for itself, economist
Category: Business
Posted By: DerbyX
Date: 2011-06-22 07:19:35
Canadian


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8157
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:40 am
 


Good stuff. If we want to rely less on immigration, we need to make a more kid/family friendly country.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2664
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:04 am
 


Does this mean we can hold back some of that $8 billion in transfer payments? Perhaps pay for services in our provinces.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6584
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:12 am
 


Yeah, sure. That's why it's always in ever growing deficit. It's "paying itself" :lol:
I hate those biased "report" that tries to pass as objective because the guy is an 'intellectual'.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6584
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:22 am
 


What Fortin 'forgets' to take into account, is that while it's true it boosted the number of birth for some years, it's not a permanent process. It's just that that generation of women decided to have babies younger than before. They have babies at 25 instead of 30 yo. So the two 'generations' overlapped and by that effect, it boosted birth numbers. However, it doesn't mean they make MORE babies. They just had the same rate of babies before they would have without the program. That overlapping period where those two generations had babies at the same time is now over according to the recent birthrate.

He plays with the numbers, like most 'economists' report to sustain an agenda.

As an example, a report last week from another 'economist' said that Quebec was not a 'welfare state' of Canada at all and that, in fact, we were contributing MORE to Canada than what we receive. So, those reports have to be taken more as opinions than as facts.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.