CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:16 pm
 


DerbyX DerbyX:
Tricks Tricks:
DerbyX DerbyX:

Actually they would be welcoming the US liberators with open arms and applications for US social security cards.

The people who would die resisting would be your Streakers.

The truth is often ugly and beautiful at the same time.

O rly?


:lol:

I had you in mind when I wrote that looking for just such a response.
Good.
$1:
Yes people like Streaker would be the first to respond and many cons like (well they know who they are) would be the first in line for SSCs.
Just making sure you don't leave me out of the fight. However, do you think dippers like streaker could actually take basic training and fighting a war. I don't.
$1:
The truth is that given the anti-American sentiment ascribed to the Libs and NDP do you really think we would be the first to submit over so many cons who are defacto Americans anyway?

No they would definitely fight it. But just not physically. They have been conditioned to be far to passive to turn that around in a heart beat.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:19 pm
 


DerbyX DerbyX:
Do you consider invading a trusted ally and trigger exhaustion from killing unarmed opponents honourable marine activities?


Actually, the question was posed by someone who assumed that their trusted ally would invade them. T'wasn't I who broached the trust, mon ami. I merely addressed the hypothetical.

$1:
Streaker doesn't openly deride the military just the current use of it invading innocent foreign countries on the pretense of helping them.


Afghanistan is arguably better off than it was before. Iraq, for some it is better off, for many more it is not. Time will tell what comes of it.

$1:
You talk about the invasion of Canada as a cakewalk but you invaded iraq in a few weeks and lost more soldiers after peace was declared.


Re-read what I posted. I know the US forces and I know the CF pretty good, too. The US would prevail in any such contest by sheer weight of numbers and technology. But I did not presume to call it a cakewalk with an assumption of every Canadian casualty coming at the cost of 1.5 to 3 American casualties.

$1:
Canada will be backed by NATO, specifically the UK, France, and every country in the world actually (accept AUS).


It won't happen so that's irrelevant.

$1:
It won't ever happen but I trust Streaker far more....


I trust Streaker, too. I've never found a reason to doubt his word. But the words he's posted tell me he lacks the foundational values that are required to be a soldier.

Were Streaker ordered to take a building under fire that was known to shelter helpless women and children I doubt he'd do it. Even though there would be known to be an enemy commander hiding among them coordinating a devastating attack on his troops.

/\
That is the kind of scenario that real soldiers run into in the real world all the time. You may think that makes him a better man that he'd refuse to do this, and maybe it does, but it makes him a lousy soldier and it's sometimes the moment's hesitation of one man or the moment of inspiration that changes the course of an entire war.

A soldier's commitments, in order, are properly to his squad, then his platoon, then his company, then on up to his country.

Myself, I doubt like hell I'd blow up a building full of women and children for Chimpy McFlightsuit, but I would not hesitate one second to do it for my squad. Not one second. Not one.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:22 pm
 


Gunnair Gunnair:
Right, you can stop there, the rest is embarrasing drivel of you riding the coat tails of your relatives' military service.

STFU already.

Idiot.

So people who haven't served can't comment on the support or lack thereof from there government when it comes to the military? Cause I call bullshit on that.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:24 am
 


lily lily:
You took offense to that, but not to hwacker's post?

Interesting. ;)

Actually I did, but enough people jumped on it. I don't need to gang up on hwacker. I responded to gunnair's because no one said anything about it.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21611
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:22 am
 


:|


Last edited by Public_Domain on Fri Feb 21, 2025 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21611
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:04 am
 


:|


Last edited by Public_Domain on Fri Feb 21, 2025 10:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14063
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:05 am
 


Can nobody actually address the relevant issue?

Apparently losing your freedoms is perfectly acceptable if it's done in the name of combating terrorism. Border officers can virtually rape your personal privacy, taking laptops, cellphones, documents, books, pamphlets and hard drives, for absolutely no reason, and some here think that's just fine, as long as you keep your head in the clouds and think it'll end terrorism and keep them damned 'Muzzies' at bay.

It's mind boggling.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14063
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:07 am
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Myself, I doubt like hell I'd blow up a building full of women and children for Chimpy McFlightsuit, but I would not hesitate one second to do it for my squad. Not one second. Not one.
Wow! such an admirable display of character and values!

Jesus Christ.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21611
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:12 am
 


:|


Last edited by Public_Domain on Fri Feb 21, 2025 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21611
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:25 am
 


:|


Last edited by Public_Domain on Fri Feb 21, 2025 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21611
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:37 am
 


:|


Last edited by Public_Domain on Fri Feb 21, 2025 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:19 am
 


Tricks Tricks:
Gunnair Gunnair:
Right, you can stop there, the rest is embarrasing drivel of you riding the coat tails of your relatives' military service.

STFU already.

Idiot.

So people who haven't served can't comment on the support or lack thereof from there government when it comes to the military? Cause I call bullshit on that.


Of course not. Just hwacker.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14063
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:23 am
 


Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
It's called "Zeitgeist". If you are Right-Wing, Religious and possibly blindly patriotic, there is a good chance you will stop watching this movie before it's 5 minutes in. Not because you think it's bullshit,
I stopped watching it after 5 minutes because it's bullshit - the notion that you think you're personally "revealing" this piece of crap to the world is a joke, it's over a year old.


Last edited by Blue_Nose on Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:29 am
 


Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Myself, I doubt like hell I'd blow up a building full of women and children for Chimpy McFlightsuit, but I would not hesitate one second to do it for my squad. Not one second. Not one.
Wow! such an admirable display of character and values!

Jesus Christ.


Concur.

Image

Just did it for the squad.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:55 am
 


Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
Can nobody actually address the relevant issue?

Apparently losing your freedoms is perfectly acceptable if it's done in the name of combating terrorism. Border officers can virtually rape your personal privacy, taking laptops, cellphones, documents, books, pamphlets and hard drives, for absolutely no reason, and some here think that's just fine, as long as you keep your head in the clouds and think it'll end terrorism and keep them damned 'Muzzies' at bay.

It's mind boggling.


Concur, but what's more to address?

The US continues to run in high fear gear, and so many of the residents are brainwashed into the new MccArthyism of terrorists under the bed. Until some political force builds up to slow this train down, it will continue to speed up until it wrecks.

I certainly do wonder where all the misplaced ire is though. Remove the ability to own automatic assault rifles and the world would be coming to an end as the government prepares to establish a dictatorship. Remove the privacy of your electronics as you cross the border and.... nothing.

Hmmmmmmmm. :roll:


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 181 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 3  4  5  6  7  8  9 ... 13  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.