|
Author |
Topic Options
|
eureka
Forum Elite
Posts: 1244
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:25 am
Such a telling response, Gunnair. Now, have you considered the Status of Women programme and Kairos? As just a couple of examples.
|
Brenda
CKA Uber
Posts: 50938
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:33 am
eureka eureka: Such a telling response, Gunnair. Now, have you considered the Status of Women programme and Kairos? As just a couple of examples. I don't want to be a bitch or something, but what does that have to do with the British PM asking around if they can please change the succession law for Will and Kate's kids?
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:41 am
The old coot is nuttier than squirrel shit.
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:15 am
Brenda Brenda: eureka eureka: Such a telling response, Gunnair. Now, have you considered the Status of Women programme and Kairos? As just a couple of examples. I don't want to be a bitch or something, but what does that have to do with the British PM asking around if they can please change the succession law for Will and Kate's kids? Nothing. Next he'll be complaining about the Jets losing streak as yet another example of how evil the Harper Conservatives are.
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:24 am
eureka eureka: Such a telling response, Gunnair. Now, have you considered the Status of Women programme and Kairos? As just a couple of examples. Examples of what? Harper being a mysogynist? $1: mi·sog·y·nis·tic (m-sj-nstk) also mi·sog·y·nous (-sj-ns) adj. Of or characterized by a hatred of women. Stick to claiming to know something about climate science because you apparently have little clue about what a misogynist is if that's what you use for examples.
|
eureka
Forum Elite
Posts: 1244
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:21 pm
Your great respect for the other sex, Gunnair, allows to dismiss those examples.
It has nothing to do with the Monarchy, Brenda. It does have to do with my surprise that Harper could accept female succession.
But then, it is one more political move by Harper is it not since, not long ago, this was his position:
“The successor to the throne [Prince Charles] is a man,” said Mr. Harper. “The next successor to the throne [Prince William] is a man. I don’t think Canadians want to open a debate on the monarchy or constitutional matters at this time. That’s our position, and I just don’t see that as a priority for Canadians right now at all.”
British commentators expressed their disappointment in Harper at the time. They wanted Canada's support.
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:33 pm
eureka eureka: Your great respect for the other sex, Gunnair, allows to dismiss those examples.
It does. I generally give little credence (beyond the obvious humour factor)to the political temper tantrums and partisan playground tirades offered by any idiot of the far left or far right. Any obviously pathetic attempt to equate that Harper is a woman hater simply because he won't throw bags of cash at your pet projects of the week demonstrates the depths of political immaturity you are wallowing in, friend. Please, call out for a rope if you need one.. or don't. I care not, really.
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:37 pm
nope...he generally calls out for more paint after he's painted himself into a corner, as Dr. Caleb pointed out.
|
eureka
Forum Elite
Posts: 1244
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:02 pm
Just the usual lame responses!
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:04 pm
eureka eureka: Just the usual lame responses! Keep practicing, and you'll eventually work up to a usual lame response. 
|
Posts: 15244
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:42 pm
My preferred outcome:
------------------------------------------------ From: Buckingham Palace [Buckingham@co.uk] To: Stephen Harper [Stephen.Harper@gc.canada.ca] Sent: September 1, 2011 Subject: FW: FW: FW: FW: Consent to Royal Succession Marked: Urgent
Steve,
WTF???
-Phil.
---------------------------
From: Buckingham Palace [Buckingham@co.uk] To: Stephen Harper [Stephen.Harper@gc.canada.ca] Sent: September 1, 2011 Subject: FW: FW: FW: FW: Consent to Royal Succession Marked: Urgent
Hi Stephen,
Any update on this item?
Buckingham Palace
------------------------------------- From: Buckingham Palace [Buckingham@co.uk] To: Stephen Harper [Stephen.Harper@gc.canada.ca] Sent: FW: FW: FW: Consent to Royal Succession
Hi Stephen,
We presume that you must not have received our prior communictions on this item. Please see below.
Regards,
Buckingham Palance
------------------------------------- From: Buckingham Palace [Buckingham@co.uk] To: Stephen Harper [Stephen.Harper@gc.canada.ca] Sent: July 1, 2011 Subject: FW: FW: Consent to Royal Succession
Dear Stephen,
We eagerly await your reply to our earlier communications reagridng succession to the Throne of England and Her Realms. Please reply at your earliest convenience.
Kindest Reagards,
Buckingham Palace ------------------------------------- From: Buckingham Palace [Buckingham@co.uk] To: Stephen Harper [Stephen.Harper@gc.canada.ca] Sent: June 1, 2011 Subject: FW: Consent to Royal Succession
Dearest Stephen,
We have yet to receive a response from you regarding our earlier communications on the subject of succession to the Throne of England and Her Realms. Please advise of your government's intent to support our measure.
Faithfully Yours,
Buckingham Palace
------------------------------------- From: Buckingham Palace [Buckingham@co.uk] To: _Commonwealth countries [Group] Sent: May 1, 2011 Subject: Consent to Royal Succession Attachment: Royal_Succession.pdf
Dear Commonwealth Nations,
Please review the attached document regarding our propsed reforms to Succession to the Royal Throne. We trust that you will provide your official response within 30 days. Document passoword follows our usual convention.
With God's Love,
Buckingham Palace
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:04 am
I think there may be a joke hiding in there...not sure...but i think so.
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:53 am
Spam
|
Posts: 33691
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:03 am
lizaC lizaC: IS QUEEN ELIZABETH JEWISH? It is hard to believe that official and national figures we honor most of all can be very secretive. But, unfortunately, people are being deceived a lot. The mystery of the Jewish descendents is discussed secretly in the ruling circles. Did you ever question why the wedding of the world of Kate Middleton and Prince William was set on Friday? Was it anyhow connected with sanctity of Saturday that Jewish people observe? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvxkyQAIqN8[video][/video] Here is the real joke Shep...  Listen up chump, we all know Wilie and Kate were married on Friday because they are secret Muslims. When Willie becomes King, he will convert all us white folk over to Islam, then we can get them Joooooooooooooooos real good. Bombs away !!!! 
|
Posts: 15681
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:09 am
lizaC lizaC: IS QUEEN ELIZABETH JEWISH? It is hard to believe that official and national figures we honor most of all can be very secretive. But, unfortunately, people are being deceived a lot. The mystery of the Jewish descendents is discussed secretly in the ruling circles. Did you ever question why the wedding of the world of Kate Middleton and Prince William was set on Friday? Was it anyhow connected with sanctity of Saturday that Jewish people observe? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvxkyQAIqN8[video][/video] Wow, foiler city. British royal weddings of stature are held on weekdays so the plebs can attend. They make it a 'bank holiday' so everybody is off. Those Jews don't half get unexpected hatred. Makes me wanna ditch the RC thing and become a Jew. I'm just not that into religion though.
|
|
Page 4 of 5
|
[ 62 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests |
|
|