Lemmy Lemmy:
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
And Yet, fearless leader is still in HIS party despite committing assault in Parliament. An actual crime!
If that were true, he'd have been charged.
Police don't just charge you with assault unless someone presses charges. Except in domestic violence cases.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
But you're such a partisan hack I have grave doubts you see it that way.
Lemmy Lemmy:
How's that any different from you out-and-out lying about Trudeau to further your partisan agenda?
What lies? Trudeau committed assault according to Section 265(1)(a) of the Criminal Code. His actions are there for the world to see.
Nor am I a partisan. Assaulting people in Parliament would be entirely unacceptable no matter who was PM.
The difference between you and I is, if it was Harper that had done this, I wouldn't have come up with the weak-ass bullshit you did about how Trudeau was merely
helping the Conservative Whip get through the crowd.
He shoved MPs out of the way while saying "get the fuck out of my way" (assault), he grabbed the Whip by the arm and dragged him through the crowd (assault), and inadvertently assaulted another MP while he carried out his initial assault.
Now just in case you weren't paying attention the last time. 265 (1) A person commits an assault when
(a)
without the consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to that other person, directly or indirectly;http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts ... n-265.htmlNot entirely sure how you can say it isn't assault. I guess the CCoC has the definition wrong. Maybe someone should go ask a bunch of economists what the definition of assault is because clearly you have a much better understanding of it than the law makers, justice system and courts.