andyt andyt:
IF those are serious thoughts, stick to the non-serious ones.
When times are good for prey, they increase the population which makes it good times for the predators and they increase - reducing the prey population which in turn reduces the predators. Classic example is the Lynx-Hare cycle.
Oh, good Andy's feeling tough. I like that. Then I don't have to feel guilty when pointing out the obviously moronic.
OK, so you're wanting to pretend you understood what I said, are you?
Let's say it again, then, because I doubt it.
What you're talking about is a thing everybody already knows.
Mine was a theory that proposes when prey becomes over-abundant in an area, a section of the population appears to get self destructive.
You know kind of like you and you affection for jihadis. They say to your face. "We want to kill you Andy. Our sacred book commands us to kill you." But you say, "Uh huh...wanna Canadian passport."
It's like that. Or remember earlier when you were talking about how deer will sometimes get so over-populated in the bush, they'll walk into a city of human predators and start eating people's roses. That's dumb right. I mean not even you would do that if you were a deer, right? It's that dumb. Could we call that self-destructive. I say yes.
Even you should understand this. But don't tell me if you don't, OK. I don't wanna do the have to do the tell you 20 times until you understand thing today.
BTW, ever figure out what abrogation was?