xerxes xerxes:
True. But the Daily Mail has a lot of precedent of making stories up to sell papers and generate traffic. This all I'm saying.
World Nut Daily is even worse, still, they occasionally break with actual news once in a while so I'm careful not to just dismiss them out of hand.
As I recall, the Edward Snowden stuff broke in some odd corners of the net and the vastness of the NSA's monitoring was initially dismissed as too fantastic to be true.
Yet it was.
Heck, it was The National Enquirer that broke the civil case against OJ Simpson wide open and they also managed to find the body of Chandra Levy when the FBI and DC police failed to do so.
In sum, these oddball media groups periodically do serve a purpose.